The Buck Stops Here: Why Ownership Builds Better Engineering Teams
In any software engineering organization—whether a fast-moving startup or an enterprise-scale platform—leadership style doesn’t just shape the culture; it defines it. And when things go wrong (which they will), how leaders respond sets the tone for how teams grow, communicate, and deliver.
Over the years, I’ve seen two dramatically different approaches play out: one where leaders instinctively point fingers when things go off the rails, and one where leaders step up and say, “The buck stops here.” The difference between these styles is more than philosophy—it’s a deciding factor in whether your team thrives or erodes under pressure.
Where “The Buck Stops Here” Comes From
The phrase “the buck stops here” was popularized by U.S. President Harry S. Truman, who kept a sign with those words on his desk in the Oval Office. It was a plain declaration of personal responsibility: decisions had to be made, and he was the one who would ultimately make them—and own them.
The saying itself originates from the frontier card game poker, where passing the “buck” (a marker or token) meant deferring the responsibility to deal. Truman’s message was clear: the deferring ends with him.
What’s remarkable is the contrast between Truman’s decisions—matters of war, peace, and global consequence—and the far lower-stakes decisions we face in corporate environments. And yet, many leaders in tech still struggle to own outcomes with even a fraction of that clarity and conviction.
The Blame-First Leader
The blame-first leader is easy to spot, especially when a project slips a deadline, a production incident occurs, or a demo fails. Their reflexive response is to find who messed up, not what went wrong or why. They’re quick to name names, slow to ask questions, and almost never examine their own decisions.
Sometimes, these leaders blame out of insecurity. Sometimes, it’s political. But regardless of motive, the outcome is the same:
- Teams stop taking risks.
- Engineers cover their tracks instead of surfacing problems early.
- Innovation slows because nobody wants to be the one who “gets it wrong.”
Ironically, blame-first leaders often think they’re increasing accountability. What they’re actually doing is creating fear—and fear is poison for creative, high-performing engineering teams.
The Ownership-First Leader: “The Buck Stops Here”
In contrast, the leaders who take ownership—even when the mistake wasn’t directly theirs—build something powerful: trust.
When an incident happens, these leaders say, “I’m responsible.” Not because they wrote the faulty code or misconfigured the system, but because it happened on their watch. Their job is to build the system and the team in a way that avoids those outcomes—or catches them early.
This kind of leadership does a few things incredibly well:
-
Creates psychological safety Engineers don’t fear being honest. They escalate issues early. They flag uncertainty. They experiment. And most importantly, they learn.
-
Builds accountability the right way Because leaders own the outcomes, teams start to do the same. Ownership cascades downward. The best teams I’ve led had engineers who would say, “That bug is on me—I’ll fix it.” Not because they were afraid, but because that’s how the team operates.
-
Enables continuous improvement When blame isn’t the focus, learning becomes the priority. The conversation shifts from who caused it to what do we do better next time.
So, Which Style Builds Better Teams?
The answer is clear: ownership beats blame. Every time.
Blame may offer short-term relief for insecure leaders, but it kills long-term performance. Ownership fosters accountability, learning, and trust—the very things that make teams resilient and successful.
If you’re a leader reading this, ask yourself: when the next big problem hits, will your instinct be to protect your image, or protect your team?
Choose wisely. The health of your engineering org depends on it.
If you are a leader, remember: The buck stops with you. Lead that way.